1. Help Center
  2. Technical Papers
  3. Cleanroom Product Selection Road Map: Recommended Practices

What Are the Best Practices for Selecting Cleanroom Products

Setting Up Selection Criteria for Re-usable and Single-use Cleanroom Consumables

Debunking bad science to simplify product selection.

A Class 10 cleanroom garment or a Class 100 wiper or glove does not exist. Manufacturers asserting a product is certified to a broad cleanroom standard is an overgeneralization that was the result of a marketing fad in the 1990s.

This technical paper explains how controlled environments should develop criteria for critical reusable and single-use materials in line with IEST Recommended Practices.

At the time, manufacturers attempted to tie the Federal Standard 209E for air cleanliness classifications (e.g. Class 10, 100, 1000) to cleanroom materials, making comparisons that did not necessarily exist.

A Class 10, 100, or 1000 cleanroom glove, wiper, or garment does not truly exist, despite manufacturers' attempts to correlate it with air cleanliness classifications.

Federal Standard 209E was replaced by ISO 14644-1 and -2 air cleanliness classifications (e.g. ISO 4,5,6) in 1999. Additionally, characterizing a cleanroom wiper, garment or mop as non-linting or non-shedding is misleading.

All consumables brought into the cleanroom, whether reusable or single-use, will shed particles at some level of detection. Do not be confused or misled by vendors that perpetuate the bad science of marketing an environmental air quality cleanliness standard (Federal Standard 209E or ISO 14644-1 and -2) for consumables used in that environment.

How should controlled environments develop criteria for critical reusable and single-use materials?

Approximately 20% of the controlled environment market provides laundering services for reusable cleanroom garments, monitoring, certification, and cleaning services. The balance of vendors in the cleanroom market supplies consumables: gloves, wipes, mops, tacky mats, disposable apparel, paper, swabs, etc.

Consumables worn and brought into the cleanroom protect the product, process, and integrity of the cleanroom to varying degrees. As NEBB studies illustrate, 70% of the contaminants in your cleanroom are operator-generated.

Therefore, the vendors supplying the consumables are critical to the success of the cleanroom integrity, and selecting the most effective garments, gloves and wipes should be more than a procurement pricing and availability exercise.

Vendor selection for cleanroom consumables used in controlled environments should be based on criteria found in IEST Recommended Practices and ISO 14644 series of international cleanroom standards.

Purchasing, production, and quality departments must collaborate to determine the best solution for their product, process, and people. The final specification for consumables worn and brought into cleanrooms should be based on test data released by the manufacturer or an independent, third-party lab.

IEST Recommended Practices

Several IEST RPs address the test parameters and recommend specifications. IEST recommends testing methods that are generally accepted, published, and repeatable at third-party labs.

An operation’s internal testing methods should correlate with the published manufacturer specifications. If the testing methods are not consistent, the user should perform testing on each production lot to ensure the incoming material is compliant with their internal specification.

Qualifying A Secondary Source For Cleanroom Consumables

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most cleanroom operations sourced critical materials used in cleanroom production from a sole source vendor that provided just-in-time delivery of the materials.

During the past three years, the supply chain for these materials has been severely disrupted. To make supply chains more resilient and redundant, leading cleanroom operations are now qualifying and actively sourcing from primary and secondary manufacturers for critical materials. A redundant source is now widely considered a best practice in the cleanroom consumable qualification process.

When selecting multiple vendors, it is imperative to compare each product by its tested characteristics and suitability for use in that specific application. Challenge any new material vendor to demonstrate the product equivalency of its recommendation to your incumbent product before starting the new product qualification process.

 

Download Your PDF Copy Now!

 

Authored by Jan Eudy for Valutek.

Jan is an independent Cleanroom and Contamination Control consultant as well as a Fellow, Past President, and Senior Faculty Instructor of the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology.